Evolution of the perception of the threats to security in Spain
Evolution of the perception of the threats to security in Spain
Blog Article
security was internal, in other words, subversion and opposition to the regime.Public opinion, however, revealed that characteristics very different to those in the context of the western block existed, such as a void perception of the soviet threat as opposed to a marked antiamericanism for its support of the regime.This legacy of threats weighed heavily during the transition together with the existence of a cleavage between the armed forces, the political actors and public opinion regarding the real necessity of intergration into NATO.In the eighties there exists a clear differentiation between the threats perceived by public opinion and those considered by the political elites.
With regard to the former,serious threats to Spain do not exist.only certain concerns when the subject of security took on importance in the field of public opinion, such as during the referendum campaign over bekindtopets.com NATO in 1986 which was mixed with the scarce perception of the soviet threat, theconstant danger represented by the United States and the slight rise in those who believed in the Moroccan threat, and the impact of the Gulf War in 1991 and the consequent increase of the threat represented by the arab countries.For the political actors, the mainthreat contemplated was the protection of territorial integrity on a stage closer to the western Mediterranean instead of a global threat to the western block something only considered at a theoretical level with the strategic concept of Spanish defence within the framework of participation in NATO.From 1992 onwards with the Defence Directive, the threat concept is replaced by that of risk and which recovers the importance given over to North Africa.
It is sex shop arles argued in the belief that security is indivisible and must be shared not only with the European members.A greater convergence is also initiated in the nineties between the political actors and public opinion with respect to considering what are the risks in a global situation of interdependence, with the exception of one point, regarding the difference that exists on behalf of society over how to consider the US.